Insight

Why Law Firms Working with Large Institutions Need a Formal Cybersecurity Program

Your Clients Are Asking Questions You May Not Be Able to Answer


A few years ago, a law firm's cybersecurity posture was rarely a factor in outside counsel selection. That has changed. Large corporations, insurance carriers, healthcare organizations, and government entities now routinely include security questionnaires as part of the outside counsel engagement process. Those questionnaires ask specific questions about the firm's security controls, incident history, data handling practices, access management, and whether the firm maintains a documented cybersecurity program. Firms that can answer those questions with documented evidence win engagements. Firms that cannot are increasingly screened out before the conversation about legal expertise begins.


The security questionnaires that large institutional clients send to outside counsel are not perfunctory. They ask whether the firm has a written information security policy and how recently it was reviewed. They ask about access control practices, specifically whether multi-factor authentication is deployed across all systems that handle client data. They ask about incident response: does the firm have a documented plan, has it been tested, and what is the notification timeline if client data is involved in a breach? A firm that has not built a cybersecurity program cannot answer most of those questions with specificity. Our Cybersecurity practice develops and implements formal security programs for law firms that hold up to exactly this kind of scrutiny.


The Professional Obligation That Already Exists


Beyond client expectations, law firms have independent professional obligations around client data security. State bar ethics rules in virtually every jurisdiction require attorneys to take reasonable measures to protect client information from unauthorized disclosure. What constitutes reasonable measures has evolved as the threat environment has changed, and bar authorities in multiple states have issued guidance making clear that basic security controls are now part of that standard. A firm without a cybersecurity program is not just at competitive disadvantage. It is operating with a compliance gap that professional liability carriers increasingly price into their premiums.


A cybersecurity program is a framework of documented policies, implemented controls, and ongoing practices that collectively demonstrate that the firm takes information security seriously and manages it systematically. The foundation is a written information security policy that defines the firm's security requirements, assigns responsibility for security functions, and establishes the standards that all systems and users must meet.

What the Program Actually Consists Of


An incident response plan documents what the firm does when a security event occurs: how incidents are detected, who is notified, what investigation steps are followed, when clients and regulators must be informed, and how the firm returns to normal operations. The plan needs to exist on paper and have been exercised through a tabletop simulation before it is needed in a real incident. Employee security training needs to be documented, role-specific, and conducted at a frequency that reflects the evolving threat environment. Annual checkbox training does not meet the standard that institutional clients or bar authorities are increasingly applying.


The deliverable is not a report. It is a working security program that the firm can demonstrate to any client, carrier, or auditor who asks to see it. The starting point is a security assessment that documents the current posture against the frameworks that institutional clients and bar authorities use to evaluate security programs. From that assessment, the controls are designed and implemented, the policies that govern them are documented, and the ongoing practices that keep the program current are established. A firm that has done that work is in a fundamentally different position than one that has not, in every conversation that matters.

Stay updated with newest insights